Fridge d?

Posted by mike d. Filed in A Day In The Life...

For the upcoming house purchase, Jen and I are exploring options for appliances. One such appliance, the refrigerator, has caused some mental frustration.

Annoyance: Refrigerator vs. Fridge
Where did that D come from in the abbreviated form Fridge?

After some research I’ve learned that the reasoning is sloppy. When a G is sandwiched between vowels it often creates a combo sound of d+guh, like refrigerator, regenerate, and gauge. However, sometimes when it’s at the end of a word the preceding vowel is lengthened and the G loses it’s D sound: Think Oblige or Siege. Why? I have no idea. Grammerphils care to comment?

One’s first attempt to correct this might be to remove the E at the end of the word, but that ends up making Frig rhyme with Wig.

The best way to force the pronunciation was to add a D. Think: Ledge, Bridge, Ridge, Fudge, Melissa Ethridge.

Here’s why it’s sloppy: Garbage, Pillage. Neither have the D but both have the D sound. One site suggests that this is because the accent is on the first syllable.

In conclusion: who knows? English is weird.

Posted by mike d. Filed in A Day In The Life...

Yesterday Jen and I finally succeeded in moving on what has been a fairly long drawn our process of bidding on a new home. After weeks of looking we found a home in Clinton, CT. We were trying to find a place in Guilford, but the prices were too high for the quality of house.

We pushed further east and ended up two towns away in Clinton. Clinton is a tiny shoreline community: Just 19sq miles with ~13,500 people. The town has an abundance of inland wetlands (17% of the town is water), and our future home is one that includes wetlands.

The view from the backyard.

About 40% of our property will be pond. This comes with advantages and disadvantages. Privacy and wildlife are assured, but so too are mosquitoes and fewer land based wooded adventures. Still, excitement abounds.

At the moment we are expecting a closing the week of April 1st. More pictures to follow!

Posted by mike d. Filed in A Day In The Life...


Twelve Dollars!

Posted by mike d. Filed in family

This past weekend Jen and I took the Parents D to see a play at the Bushnell in Hartford. It was Mom D’s birthday a few weeks back and what’s better than a theatrical production? Nothing! The choice? War Horse – complete with puppets and horses!

Gad zooks that play is dark.

I was completely unprepared for the carnage and emotionally draining plot. Sure, with the word War in the title I was expecting some level of seriousness – but there was death and destruction beyond my greatest expectations!

The production was amazing, use of sound and light were stunning, and of course the Horse puppets were awe inspiring. The puppeteers weren’t really hidden at all, but it eventually got the point where we no longer noticed them. In fact, the first half of the play was a bit slower than I would have liked… but you know… character development and stuff.

Overall, I’d give War Horse 4 stars. And despite the perhaps less than lively juxtaposition with my Mom’s birthday, it was an amazing experience. Unfortunately, the show is no longer available in Hartford – but I’d certainly recommend you go to check it out if it comes to your area.

Posted by mike d. Filed in RockStar

With my extended (~60min) work commute from West Hartford to East Haven, I have been listening to lessons on CD from the Great Courses program. The strength of the courses, not unlike at any institution, is entirely in the quality of the teacher.

Thankfully the instructor of much of the music series, Professor Robert Greenburg, is excellent. So far I’m on my third set of discs.

1. How to listen to and understand great music (Greenburg)
2. Elements of Jazz, from Cakewalks to Fusion (Bill Messenger)
3. Understanding the Fundamentals of Music (Greenburg)

The courses, specifically Greenburg’s, have been eye opening. Greenburg focuses on classical music genres. I have learned WAY more than I thought I would have. Before the course I wouldn’t have been able to tell you the difference between Bach and Stravinsky. Now, I feel pretty confident in identifying music to specific Classical eras.

Further, despite casual music for most of my life, the Fundamentals of Music has taught me a ton on the workings of musical mechanics. It is admittedly academic with a fair amount of time being spent on definition and word origin, but it’s valuable information and I’m pleased with what I’ve learned.

In particular, two of my long-time questions of music have been answered

1. Question: C Major scale has no flats or sharps. Why the heck did they choose to label the EASIEST scale with the letter C. Why not start the easiest chord with the easiest letter, A?
Answer: A minor is the relative minor of C major. And apparently back in the day, the minor scales was more musically important than the major scales. So those that made the decision, chose to put the most important minor scale with the fewest accidentals as the A. That makes sense!

2. Question: Why is it that the 7th note of each scale, as you progress through the sharps of different keys, is always the last sharped? For example, key of G: F# (that’s the 7th.) Key of D, F# and C# (C# is the 7th). It works like this the whole way! But Flats? No 7ths there!
Answer: I was thinking about this entirely incorrectly. Instead if you look at the circle of fifths the signatures AND the accidentals follow in fifths and fourths as you progress around the circle. The 7th thing works out on the sharps. On the flat side the flats progress on the 3rd.


I strongly recommend Greenburg’s courses.



Posted by mike d. Filed in A Day In The Life...

Christmas 2013 yielded many fun gifts, but one in particular was highly unexpected. On my yearly DiDonato Christmas list, I had included a stand upon which I could shine my shoes. To some this might seem a very odd request, but growing up I had always admired Dad D’s shoe shining kit. I remember the biting smell of shoe polish and the unexpectedly loud whir of his Ronson Two Speed Roto-Shine shoe polishing motor.

I wasn’t looking for anything as elaborate as his – just a stand upon which I could apply elbow grease and achieve new levels of luster on my work footware.

You can imagine my surprise when Dad D procured for me my very own Ronson Two Speed Roto-Shine Shoe Polisher!!!

oh the glory!

oh the glory!

So... many... attachments...

So… many… attachments…


There was, however, a problem. Only the high-speed was working. Dad D and I took the motor apart and found a fairly simple design.

The switching mechanism switches between two different circuits. One of the two circuits provides a direct connection of line voltage to the motor: Full Speed. The second does the same, except there’s a resistor in the path. This is unsurprising. The Resistor limits the voltage going to the motor. If that resistor fried, then the circuit wouldn’t work.

When we tested the resistor with an ohm meter we got nothing. This suggested deadness. Unfortunately, the resister was really weird looking. It didn’t have the traditional color scheme… but being that the unit was from the 50′s, we didn’t think much of it. Still, we had no way to determine what the value of that resistor was.

I decided to enlist an electrical engineer to aid in the process.

Enter: Sander

Sander and I took a look at the circuit. I told him about the weird resistor and he too agreed that it was weird. “Simple solution!” Sander declared as he pulled a potentiometer from his grab back of electrical goodies, “We’ll use a pot and gauge speed by the sound of the motor.”

And that’s what we did. But the results were somewhat surprising. Figuring out the resistance was easy – but when we tried the unit with various resistors they immediately burned up. Huh?

Sander figured it out in a stroke of obviousness. Despite my insistence that this was an ancient resistor – it was no such thing. The device was a Diode. How Clever!

The diode cut out half the waveform and reduced the speed of the motor by half. By doing so, the designers were able to get away with a much smaller device within the body of the polisher.

We replaced the diode and later that night I shined my shoes to glorious levels of sheen.


Posted by mike d. Filed in Quickthoughts

You know what irritates me to no end?

The use of the word Appreciate without the preceding pronoun; The assumed “I”.

Person A: “Appreciate your coming in today!”
Person B: “I finished that report for you.”
Person A: “Appreciate it.”



Here’s the kicker: I do this all the time. And EVERY single time I do it, I hate myself.

Anyone else have self-loathing due to a poor grammatical habit?



Posted by mike d. Filed in House of Rock

The House of Rock has over 1200 sq feet of carpet within its walls. The Carpet is spread across 8 rooms:

1st floor: bedroom, dining room, living room
2nd floor: 4 bedrooms, hall+stairs

Carpet replacement comes in three steps
1. remove the old stuff
2. lay down packing
3. lay down the carpet

I contacted two companies to start: Empire Today (national) and Colonial Flooring (local). Both companies came in at roughly the same price. Empire at $4500 Colonial started at $5000. In typical salesperson fashion, both companies ‘started’ at pricing much higher ($8000 and $6000 respectively) and then found ways to reduce the price down to those above.

Affordable carpet (not the cheapest, but certainly not the most lush) runs at about $1.20/sq foot for material. With 1200 sq feet, I’m looking at ~$1,500 for the material – the rest is packing and labor.

Perhaps the easiest way to reduce cost is to do the demolition yourself. That took $500 off the Empire today quote, and $600 off the Colonial quote. Colonial, being a local provider, was more flexible in their negotiation and ultimately offered me $3500 to Empire’s $4000.

Let’s talk Demolition.

Things you need: 1 sharp box cutter, gloves, safety masks

Cutting the carpet in 3 foot sections makes it much easier to handle. While the Empire Today guy was visiting us, he showed us a quick and easy way to pull up, and manage used carpet. We took a video to share the tricks with you! Check it out:

(note: I am wearing a sweet DJ Lokash tshirt.)

Next comes the packing, or the carpet pad. Packing is rated by density and thickness. 6lb and 8lb are fairly standard on the weight side. That’s pounds per cubic foot packing. In the ideal world you’d like to have a thicker softer pad for living areas and a thinner denser pad for high traffic areas. In the case of our place, we chose to stick with the affordable. Since we won’t be living there, there is no guarantee that the carpet won’t be damaged by rough living. So I’ll likely find myself replacing the carpet again in 10 years no matter what.

I’m hoping to have all the old carpet up and out before Christmas then it’s on to the next project!

 Page 5 of 578  « First  ... « 3  4  5  6  7 » ...  Last »