<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ageing Populations.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikedidonato.com/2009/06/30/ageing-populations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2009/06/30/ageing-populations/</link>
	<description>Rock and Stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2009/06/30/ageing-populations/comment-page-1/#comment-96550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedidonato.com/2009/06/30/ageing-populations/#comment-96550</guid>
		<description>A global economy that defines prosperity as continuous growth is unsustainable, yet we fight so hard to keep it growing.  I understand that supporting an aging population will require fundamental shifts in policy, thinking and expectations, but somehow fail to see it as a bad thing that the world population is stabilizing.  

I suspect that the burdens of global overcrowding as we approach 9 billion in 2050 will somehow overshadow health care cost crises in developed nations.  Just a guess.  Although, if you don&#039;t concern yourself with the billions starving now, then you may not agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A global economy that defines prosperity as continuous growth is unsustainable, yet we fight so hard to keep it growing.  I understand that supporting an aging population will require fundamental shifts in policy, thinking and expectations, but somehow fail to see it as a bad thing that the world population is stabilizing.  </p>
<p>I suspect that the burdens of global overcrowding as we approach 9 billion in 2050 will somehow overshadow health care cost crises in developed nations.  Just a guess.  Although, if you don&#8217;t concern yourself with the billions starving now, then you may not agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
