<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carabiner Analysis</title>
	<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/</link>
	<description>It's hard being a superstar</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: mike d.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-81022</link>
		<author>mike d.</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-81022</guid>
		<description>For this example, the models were done using Catia.  We also used Solid Edge.  For the Solid Edge files we exported to STEP file and used that in ANSYS.  Unfortunately, my project partner did most of the ANSYS work, so I can't help you too much with that particular software.  I was working with COSMOS, a different FEA software, so that we could compare the results from the two different FEA programs.

We had six models:  The body, the gate, the two pins, and the two testing rods.  For the ANSYS analysis we only ran the test on half the body and half the load using symmetry to get the whole picture.  

I don't think we had much of a problem importing any of the files.  I had some tough times getting the mesh to work smoothly in COSMOS, but my ANSYS teammate spoke of no major issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For this example, the models were done using Catia.  We also used Solid Edge.  For the Solid Edge files we exported to STEP file and used that in ANSYS.  Unfortunately, my project partner did most of the ANSYS work, so I can&#8217;t help you too much with that particular software.  I was working with COSMOS, a different FEA software, so that we could compare the results from the two different FEA programs.</p>
<p>We had six models:  The body, the gate, the two pins, and the two testing rods.  For the ANSYS analysis we only ran the test on half the body and half the load using symmetry to get the whole picture.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we had much of a problem importing any of the files.  I had some tough times getting the mesh to work smoothly in COSMOS, but my ANSYS teammate spoke of no major issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam G</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-81005</link>
		<author>Cam G</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-81005</guid>
		<description>dude, were doing caribeaner testing in ansys right now for my FEA class.  how did you import this geometry? were using solidworks and an iges file but it wont work with assemblies.  this project is killing me and ANSYS hates me!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude, were doing caribeaner testing in ansys right now for my FEA class.  how did you import this geometry? were using solidworks and an iges file but it wont work with assemblies.  this project is killing me and ANSYS hates me!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Schenk</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79506</link>
		<author>Ryan Schenk</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79506</guid>
		<description>Me too, I wanted to see it shatter and send shrapnel flying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too, I wanted to see it shatter and send shrapnel flying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79477</link>
		<author>Roland</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79477</guid>
		<description>What a cliffhanger (pun intended)... I wanted to see it break!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a cliffhanger (pun intended)&#8230; I wanted to see it break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79249</link>
		<author>Jesse</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79249</guid>
		<description>I have 2 questions of the utmost import.

1) Was the final loading more or less than 1 Sander equivalent?
2) If less, would my Audi biners have held?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 2 questions of the utmost import.</p>
<p>1) Was the final loading more or less than 1 Sander equivalent?<br />
2) If less, would my Audi biners have held?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike d.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79244</link>
		<author>mike d.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79244</guid>
		<description>That is correct.  Red is more stress, blue is less. 

The deformation is pretty sweet huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is correct.  Red is more stress, blue is less. </p>
<p>The deformation is pretty sweet huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt from Work</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79242</link>
		<author>Kurt from Work</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79242</guid>
		<description>What does all that mean?  Does the blue mean no stress then red mean more stress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does all that mean?  Does the blue mean no stress then red mean more stress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike d.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79227</link>
		<author>mike d.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79227</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jocelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79204</link>
		<author>Jocelyn</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikedidonato.com/2008/06/30/carabiner-analysis/#comment-79204</guid>
		<description>Awesome job Mike D! I &#60;3 FEA simulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome job Mike D! I &lt;3 FEA simulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
