New Comments

Calendar

November 2007
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Site

Font Cities

November 15th, 2007 by mike d. in Geekdom, Features

fontsf.PNG

At lunch this week Jocelyn and I were talking about text fonts and cities. The question is: If you had to choose a font to describe a city in its entirety, what font would you choose? Let’s take a look at Hartford, first we’ll start simply by describing the city, then we’ll try to find a font that screams ‘Hartford’

Hartford has a lot of insurance companies. Not many people live in the city and it’s about as far as you can get from ‘college town.’ It’s reasonably clean and seems to be a growing city. It has a good museum scene. It’s somewhat modern but it’s kind of tough to drive around. The public transportation is poor at best, but there’s a decent amount of parking.

Now for fonts… start by checking out this monster image of fonts:

now… think Hartford.

Hartford is too modern for a Times New Roman and too formal to be anywhere near Wingdings. Courier New isn’t a bad choice, but I think Hartford has enough complexity to it to escape the burdensome scenario where each letter takes up the exact same number of longitudinal pixels.* And obviously, Hartford is not a script font.

Then there’s Ariel. Not a bad choice really, it doesn’t have any serifs (I don’t think Hartford is quite worthy of serifs). It might be just a tad bit too boring for Hartford. It shouldn’t be a bold or italicized font. Century is too classy. Helvetica… Helvetica could work. So could Raavi.

I think I prefer Raavi.

What font do you think best describes your city?

*there’s a word for this type of font. Anyone know it?

RSS feed | Trackback URI

10 Comments »

Comment by Paul |
2007-11-15 03:53:03

Worchester is so Wingdings 3

 
Comment by the name |
2007-11-15 05:02:16

monospace

 
Comment by Jes Saint |
2007-11-15 08:29:39

I’m gonna say Poor Richard. It’s traditional, understated, and fairly easy to overlook, but not completely boring.

 
Comment by Andrew |
2007-11-15 12:47:22

I’ve always called them “fixed width” fonts, but yeah monospace is at least as good a word.

Boston is Garamond, I’d say. Classic, legible, stately. The high aspect ratio conveys the sophisticated tastes of the well-educated. I think the ascenders and descenders on the numerals add a little bit of class, like the brick sidewalks of the South End add to Boston. The tiny little eye on the ‘e’ is actually kind of odd-looking if you look really close — which you can say about pretty much any Bostonian you see on the street.

 
Comment by Ryan Schenk |
2007-11-15 14:23:24

Arial is a cheapened derivative of Helvetica. Arial is not nearly as pretty, but the character widths and proportions are all the same as Helvetica.

Hartford isn’t Helvetica. Hartford is not in Switzerland.

 
Comment by Aaron |
2007-11-15 15:17:07

I’d vote for Microsoft Sans Serif because that font fills me dread (like reading help files), just like driving through Hartford does.

 
Comment by Ben |
2007-11-16 15:37:55

Death to Arial, long live Helvetica.

 
Comment by Jesse |
2007-11-18 23:38:46

Mike, Ariel is a small mutant fem-fish, not a font.

Comment by Jes Saint |
2007-11-19 11:40:34

Ariel is a mermaid.

 
 
Comment by Paul Scott |
2007-11-23 13:12:55

The appropriate font is “Black Arial”

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Leave a Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.
Mortgage Calculator - Loans - Money - Phoenix Landscaping